Money and the Public Interest

[Robert Weissman <rob@essential.org>]

With the ascendancy of corporate power in America came the rise of its
primary countervailing force -- citizen activism and a vibrant public
interest movement. 

Citizens organized to fight the myriad ills inflicted on society by
corporate power -- from pollution and corruption, to child labor and
consumer fraud. 

But some of those once vibrant citizen institutions have now morphed into
unresponsive bureaucracies. Worse yet, many have been corrupted by
corporate funders. No wonder corporate America gets away with its ongoing
wave of crime and violence -- much of the opposition has been neutralized. 

Take the Greenlining Institute as a case in point. 

Based in California, the Greenlining Institute is considered by many to be
a major public interest group that fights insurance company and bank
redlining -- thus its name. 

But in fact, a big chunk of the group's funding comes from those same
giant corporations the Greenlining Institute was set up to counter. 

Over 80 percent of the Institute's $1.1 million budget in 1997, for
example, came from major corporations, according to the group's most
recent financial disclosure statement filed with the Attorney General of
California. 

In 1997, Union Bank gave $235,000. Southern California Edison gave
$114,494, Merrill Lynch 88,489. And on down the list. 

And on big bread and butter issues that affect the masses of California
consumers, the Institute has pulled its punches and sided with its
industry funders. 

In 1998, in the most problematic case, the Institute sided with the
utility industry to defeat Proposition 9, an initiative that would have
rolled back a taxpayer funded bailout of the utility companies for bad
nuclear investments, among others. 

Another case in point: Last month, three consumer groups -- Consumer
Action, Gray Panthers, and the National Consumers League -- held a press
conference in Washington, D.C. announcing the launch of a "nationwide
education campaign for seniors considering HMOs." 

And where exactly did the $150,000 come from to fund this campaign?
PacifiCare Health Systems Inc., the nation's fifth largest managed care
company and operator of the country's largest Medicare HMO, Secure
Horizons. 

This kind of corporate funding is apparently new for Gray Panthers. 

But it is nothing new for the National Consumers League -- an organization
that was started at the turn of the century to eliminate child labor, but
has morphed into a budding accounts receivable for corporate funders. 

Nor for Consumer Action. According to editorial director Linda Sherry, two
years ago, the group was 100 percent funded by corporations. Currently,
Consumer Action gets money from both big corporations and big government.
Pacific Bell recently gave $100,000 to fund a Consumer Action project on
telephone fraud. 

Earlier this month, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC),
the country's largest and oldest Hispanic organization, endorsed the
proposed merger between Bell Atlantic and GTE. 

There was no mention in LULAC's press release both GTE and Bell Atlantic
are yearly contributors to LULAC. GTE gives $25,000 a year, and Bell
Atlantic gives $35,000 a year. 

LULAC executive director Brent Wilkes said that in July 1998, the
companies asked LULAC to support the merger. LULAC president Rick Dovalina
met with the CEOs of both companies to work out the agreement. 

Wilkes said that during the meetings, LULAC demanded specific "assurances
and deliverables." 

"We were looking for companies that would be spun off," Wilkes said. "GTE
is selling some of their companies in Texas and in the Southwest. They
have specifically held one of their telephone companies out of the normal
auction process. And we helped select an Hispanic owned business
partnership that would take that company." 

When asked whether he was concerned about appearances of impropriety,
Wilkes said "we are not." 

"We have never tied support from the companies to our policy decisions,"
he said. 

When asked why the companies would want LULAC's support, Wilkes said --
"to help with their regulatory process." 

Wilkes said he believes the merger will benefit consumers. 

But more independent consumer groups, including the Washington, D.C.-based
Consumer Project on Technology (CPT), disagree. "We don't want the merger
to go through," said CPT's Jamie Love. "GTE was in a position to compete
against Bell Atlantic. Now, they won't be." 

There are independent consumer groups who refuse to take money, or be
influenced by, big corporations. But increasingly, bigger wads of money
are being waved in front of weak-kneed advocates seeking some green
comfort. Consumers beware. 

Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime
Reporter. Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based
Multinational Monitor. They are co-authors of Corporate Predators: The
Hunt for MegaProfits and the Attack on Democracy (Common Courage Press,
1999; see http://www.corporatepredators.org).

(c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

Focus on the Corporation is a weekly column written by Russell Mokhiber
and Robert Weissman. Please feel free to forward the column to friends or
repost the column on other lists. If you would like to post the column on
a web site or publish it in print format, we ask that you first contact us
(russell@essential.org or rob@essential.org).

Focus on the Corporation is distributed to individuals on the listserve
corp-focus@essential.org. To subscribe to corp-focus, send an e-mail
message to listproc@essential.org with the following all in one line:

subscribe corp-focus <your name> (no period).

Focus on the Corporation columns are posted at
<http://lists.essential.org/corp-focus>.

Postings on corp-focus are limited to the columns. If you would like to
comment on the columns, send a message to russell@essential.org or
rob@essential.org.