[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bundling apps with the OS must be harmful afterall
- Subject: Re: bundling apps with the OS must be harmful afterall
- From: "Lewis A. Mettler" <lmettler@lamlaw.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 20:29:10 -0800
- Cc: Multiple recipients of list AM-INFO <am-info@essential.org>
- Delivered-To: am-info@venice.essential.org
- Organization: Law Office of Lewis A. Mettler
- References: <00462873400620@lionsgate.com>
Mike,
Consumers see no need to post. It is only the promoters and those with
financial interests in forcing consumers to pay money that would take
issue with the article.
Just like here.
But, you could address the issue. I have noticed you failed to do so.
Others have as well.
In fact you have said nothing intelligent at all in regard to consumer
financial harm.
That is the issue by the way, not my popularity or lack of it.
But, I guess when you know you are wrong, your only choice is to attack
the author. Figures. And, yes, that is consistent with what is going
on this list. I can count a half a dozen of key issues ignored by many
yet they have plenty of time to conduct personal attacks and so-called
insults about putting their own heads below the sand.
Hey. They can drop the list for all I care. Or, they can just ignore
reality.
Mike Stephen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 16:48:32 -0500 (EST), Lewis A. Mettler wrote:
>
> >I submitted the "Bill Gates" article to ZDNet as an op-ed piece.
> >
> >http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/0,5859,2410424,00.html
> >
> >Most interesting is that they changed the title. My title was as it was
> >submitted on this list. It does not mean they agree. But, it does mean
> >they understand the issue.
> >
> >Oh. And as I recall, when it was posted here it was just one more post
> >without a meaningful reply on this list.
> >
> >So I assume:
> >
> >1) not everyone on this list actively posts their views
> >2) some who do have their head in the sand
> >3) some post their views but could not figure out how to challenge the
> >article
> >4) or, some of those who do not like the consumer perspective only
> >attack the author personally instead of addressing the issue
> >
> >For sure, #1 is true. Others have admitted that #2 is true. I assume
> >#3 is true in part. And, #4 has been demonstrated as well. (no names,
> >everyone can draw their own conclusions)
> >
> >--
> >Lewis A. Mettler, Esq.(Attorney and Software Developer)
> >lmettler@LAMLaw.com
> >http://www.lamlaw.com/ (detailed review of the Microsoft antitrust
> >trial)
> >
> It is also interesting to note that the responses are about the same as they are here as well. Of
> all the responsibilities given, none agree with him. We are certainly not in the minority in that
> regard.
>
> Mike...
> >>From the Desk of Mike Stephen
--
Lewis A. Mettler, Esq.(Attorney and Software Developer)
lmettler@LAMLaw.com
http://www.lamlaw.com/ (detailed review of the Microsoft antitrust
trial)