[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bundling is inherently unfair to consumers
- To: "Multiple recipients of list AM-INFO" <am-info@essential.org>
- Subject: Re: bundling is inherently unfair to consumers
- From: Mitch Stone <mstone@vc.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:06:55 -0800
- Delivered-To: am-info@venice.essential.org
--- From a message sent by Wandered Inn on 12/14/99 5:03 AM ---
>> AH..HA!!! So now you're *FINALLY* getting it (albeit probably
>> without realizing it yourself). You've been arguing about how *ALL* or
>> *ANY* bundling is harmful to consumers (and have even gone as far as to
>> claim it's against some unwritten 'consumer right'), but now you've
>> qualified it by stating that it's different when done by a
>> monopolist...with *THIS* I can agree. This distinction (a monopolist)
>> is the defining issue, but to use it as an example for non-monopolistic
>> products is to engage in what we use to call 'pseudo-deductive
>> reasoning'.
>
>Why did it take this long to get this out of him?
Because the ability to keep a story straight varies inversely with the
tallness of the tale.
Mitch Stone
mstone@vc.net