Re: Burden of no-harm upon those who claim it does not exist

["Lewis A. Mettler" <lmettler@lamlaw.com>]

Wandered,

Wandered Inn wrote:
> 
> "Lewis A. Mettler" wrote:
> >
> > Bundling is not only inherently unfair to consumers but also harms them
> > all.
> 
> So, every car manufacturer is guilty of this same bundling, because they
> bundle a radio with a car?

For those consumers who want to pick their own radio, "yes".

For those consumers who do not want a radio, "yes".

For those who bought the CD-Player of their choice on eBay the day
before, "yes".

Are their any consumers I missed?  Oh yes.  Those who want a Delco. 
But, what if GM gives away Delco radios for free to everyone who asks?
Then even those consumers are harmed when the car they buy includes yet
another Delco radio.  (See the Bill Gates piece.)

Unfairness and harm is being proved in detail time and time again.

All I see from others is an unsupported conclusion without any facts,
figures or concepts.

I conclude again (just by reading the posts) that bundling is unfair to
consumers and harmful to all of them.  I gave the details.  I see NO
details to the contrary.  None at all.

-- 
Lewis A. Mettler, Esq.(Attorney and Software Developer)
lmettler@LAMLaw.com
http://www.lamlaw.com/ (detailed review of the Microsoft antitrust
trial)