just who are these people?

["Lewis A. Mettler" <lmettler@lamlaw.com>]

Just who are these people who have an apparent vested interest in
discounting or disproving the findings of facts issue by Judge Jackson?

I can understand why the Microsoft lawyers might get on this list and
try to prove what they failed to prove in court.

I can understand why the Microsoft PR department might try to get on
this list too.

As for anyone else, I am puzzled.  Why should they even care?

Why should anyone be so insistent that forcing consumers to buy any
product (you name it) does not harm them?  (vegetarians would hate that
burger deal, and they should)

Let's see proof that some consumers (any consumers) are not harmed by
being forced to buy a bundled product.

False conclusions unsupported by a detailed explanation are just that,
false.

But, just who are these people so insistent upon disagreeing with the
judge?

-- 
Lewis A. Mettler, Esq.(Attorney and Software Developer)
lmettler@LAMLaw.com
http://www.lamlaw.com/ (detailed review of the Microsoft antitrust
trial)