[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bundling is inherently unfair to consumers

To: "Lewis A. Mettler" <lmettler@lamlaw.com>
Subject: Re: bundling is inherently unfair to consumers
From: "Eric M. Hopper" <hopper@omnifarious.mn.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 22:24:29 -0600
Cc: Multiple recipients of list AM-INFO <am-info@essential.org>
Delivered-To: am-info@venice.essential.org
In-Reply-To: <3855B4CC.EBAE29F4@lamlaw.com>
References: <3855B4CC.EBAE29F4@lamlaw.com>

On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 10:55:41PM -0500, Lewis A. Mettler wrote:
> >     <raising my hand>  Exception.
> 
> Send your $100.  I'll forward the software you just bought.

	Well, tell me what's in the package, and I might very well do
that.  Heck, if it gets you to stop harping on this silly point, it'll
be worth whatever you send me, so what's your address?

Have fun (if atll possible),
-- 
Its name is Public Opinion.  It is held in reverence. It settles everything.
Some think it is the voice of God.  Loyalty to petrified opinion never yet
broke a chain or freed a human soul.     ---Mark Twain
-- Eric Hopper (hopper@omnifarious.mn.org  http://omnifarious.mn.org/~hopper) --

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bundling is inherently unfair to consumers
  - From: "Lewis A. Mettler" <lmettler@lamlaw.com>

References:
- Re: bundling is inherently unfair to consumers
  - From: "Lewis A. Mettler" <lmettler@lamlaw.com>
- Re: bundling is inherently unfair to consumers
  - From: "Lewis A. Mettler" <lmettler@lamlaw.com>

Prev by Date: Re: of product promotion and consumer representation
Next by Date: Re: bundling is inherently unfair to consumers
Prev by thread: Re: bundling is inherently unfair to consumers
Next by thread: Re: bundling is inherently unfair to consumers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread