Re: calls for censorship?

[Cem Kaner <kaner@kaner.com>]

The suggestion that Lewis be banned from the list didn't come from 
opposition to a particular view. It came from a frustration with:

    -    tedious repetition
    -    ad hominem attacks

Lewis, perhaps you could listen for a while rather than posting so much.

At 02:57 AM 12/12/99 -0500, Lewis A. Mettler wrote:
>Calls for censorship?
>
>Is that what this list is all about?
>
>If somebody does not agree completely with what someone else is
>suggesting they call out the name of the other person and suggest they
>be banned or censored?
>
>I am not the one using the names of any other person on this list in the
>body of my text.
>
>I am not the one using the names of any other person who should be
>silenced.
>
>And, I am willing to not post at all unless I quote from the findings of
>facts in the antitrust trial in support of my views.
>
>If that is the standard we want in order to post, I'll go along with it.
>
>--
>Lewis A. Mettler, Esq.(Attorney and Software Developer)
>lmettler@LAMLaw.com
>http://www.lamlaw.com/ (detailed review of the Microsoft antitrust
>trial)

_______________________________________________________________________
Cem Kaner, J.D., Ph.D.
P.O. Box 1200, Santa Clara, CA 95052

http://www.kaner.com
http://www.badsoftware.com

Author (with Falk &  Nguyen) of TESTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE (2nd Ed, VNR)
Author (with David Pels) of BAD SOFTWARE (Wiley, 1998)

This e-mail communication should not be interpreted as legal advice
or a legal opinion.  The transmission of this e-mail communication
does not create an attorney-client relationship between me and you.
Do not act or rely upon law-related information in this communication
without seeking the advice of an attorney. Finally, nothing in this
message should be interpreted as a "digital signature" or "electronic
signature" that can create binding commercial transactions.