[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: calls for censorship?
- To: "Multiple recipients of list AM-INFO" <am-info@essential.org>
- Subject: Re: calls for censorship?
- From: Mitch Stone <mstone@vc.net>
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 09:53:32 -0800
- Delivered-To: am-info@venice.essential.org
--- From a message sent by Lewis A. Mettler on 12/11/99 11:57 PM ---
>Calls for censorship?
>
>Is that what this list is all about?
>
>If somebody does not agree completely with what someone else is
>suggesting they call out the name of the other person and suggest they
>be banned or censored?
>
>I am not the one using the names of any other person on this list in the
>body of my text.
>
>I am not the one using the names of any other person who should be
>silenced.
>
>And, I am willing to not post at all unless I quote from the findings of
>facts in the antitrust trial in support of my views.
>
>If that is the standard we want in order to post, I'll go along with it.
This was a call for basic civility, and hardly the first one directed at
you. Unfortunately, this is a concept with which you have consistently
demonstrated not even a nodding acquaintance. If you were banned from
this list, it would not be the first time someone had been ejected for
engaging in relentlessly obnoxious behavior. And, as I understand it, it
would not be the first time you yourself had been banned from a list for
obnoxious behavior. You claim to be cleverer than everyone else, so
certainly you can add 2+2 and come up with an accurate sum (hint: the
answer is a whole number). And don't cower behind the banner of
"censorship." Nobody who has spoken as voluminously as you have in this
forum can reasonably make such a claim when he is simply being asked to
behave like a decent human being. If you cannot comprehend what is being
requested of you, perhaps you should depart the list voluntarily.
Mitch Stone
mstone@vc.net