[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Microsoft's vision of empowering
Mitch,
Mitch Stone wrote:
>
> --- From a message sent by Gene Gaines on 12/9/99 11:07 AM ---
>
> >It is apparent that Microsoft actions ignore rights and ignore laws
> >FOR THE PURPOSE OF GAINING CONTROL.
>
> Point one: Microsoft may well have violated some of the laws of the land,
> but as far as I can see, nobody has seriously accused them of violating
> rights. I'm not just being nitpicky here. There's an important difference
> between laws and rights.
I can understand that even though you refused to give up your right to
decide which products you buy you also refuse to acknowledge that all
consumers have that same basic right regarding all of the products they
buy.
You insult consumers. Your ignore their basic rights and even claim
they have none.
<snip>
--
Lewis A. Mettler, Esq.(Attorney and Software Developer)
lmettler@LAMLaw.com
http://www.lamlaw.com/ (detailed review of the Microsoft antitrust
trial)