[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bundling is inherently unfair to consumers is incorrect...

To: Multiple recipients of list AM-INFO <am-info@essential.org>
Subject: Re: Bundling is inherently unfair to consumers is incorrect...
From: Joe Moore <Joe.Moore@sdrc.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 09:44:20 -0500
Delivered-To: am-info@venice.essential.org
Organization: No, but I can still find what I'm looking for.
References: <384DD6AA.F34A8368@lamlaw.com>
Sender: joe.moore@sdrc.com

"Lewis A. Mettler" wrote:
> 
> I am really sorry to have made that mistake.
> 
> The correct form is "Bundling is inherently unfair to consumers and in
> fact harmful to 100% of them".

It is still wrong.

--Joe

-- 
IBM's vision is apparently to make IBM hardware "scream with Microsoft 
software" --The Register,
http://www.theregister.co.uk/990927-000003.html

I have visions of screaming with (at and about) Microsoft software, too.

References:
- Bundling is inherently unfair to consumers is incorrect...
  - From: "Lewis A. Mettler" <lmettler@lamlaw.com>

Prev by Date: Re: The death of the US Patent System...
Next by Date: Re: Bundling is inherently unfair to consumers is incorrect...
Prev by thread: Bundling is inherently unfair to consumers is incorrect...
Next by thread: Re: Bundling is inherently unfair to consumers is incorrect...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread