[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Microsoft Cleared In Conn. Of Antitrust Violations
- To: "Multiple recipients of list AM-INFO" <am-info@essential.org>
- Subject: Re: Microsoft Cleared In Conn. Of Antitrust Violations
- From: Mitch Stone <mstone@vc.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 10:37:23 -0700
--- From a message sent by Steve Cohen on 7/18/1999 10:18 AM ---
>I've said all along that Bristol should have expected this treatement from
>Microsoft when they cooked up their original deal, and were foolish not to.
>However, I STILL object to the Microsoft argument those who sue them are
>merely
>envious of their wealth and trying to grab a piece for themselves.
>Bristol may
>have given them the opening with this poorly conceived legal case.
>Microsoft's
>defense is no less offensive because of it - and - mark my words - the same
>argument will be made against Caldera in their suit.
Perhaps, but I keep asking myself a selfish question: what does it matter
to me anyway? Even if Bristol had won a large cash settlement from
Microsoft, how does that affect the market for competing products? Not
one bit. This is especially the case with the Caldera suit -- a battle
over a long-obsolete product. Unless you believe that Microsoft, once
bitten, is twice shy, then the outcomes of these antitrust suits are
anticlimaxes to non-events.
Mitch Stone
mstone@vc.net