[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Norris' trial testimony
- To: "Multiple recipients of list AM-INFO" <am-info@essential.org>
- Subject: Re: Norris' trial testimony
- From: Mitch Stone <mstone@vc.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:46:11 -0700
--- From a message sent by Jerry Clabaugh on 6/9/1999 10:21 AM ---
>Possibly the most damning testimony of the trial:
>
>http://www.msnbc.com/news/277875.asp
The most recent wrinkle in the Norris testimony is his admission that, in
the end, Microsoft did not get what it wanted from IBM. The government is
now left with the task of demonstrating that it was illegal for them to
try to intimidate IBM into not competing, as they can't really show that
Microsoft succeeded in removing competitive products from the market -- a
significantly weaker point. This makes it look like Microsoft was not
operating the well-oiled steamroller portrayed by the government, but
something more on the order of inept extortion racket. I would not be in
the least bit surprised if Microsoft made that case.
Ironically, it may take Microsoft to admit that Microsoft isn't as clever
as most people think.
Mitch Stone
mstone@vc.net