Re: Company, government eyeing deal?

[Christopher Pall <christopher.pall@wmich.edu>]

Heh. I think you might be right there. I'll have to blame this one on me being
up too late (*again* :)

Though it is "more" oppositional as of late. Just what sort of language I would
describe this "new" approach would probably take a while to sort out....

I can't imagine it will last that long anyway. As it's been suggested before,
Microsoft spends too much money for them to keep giving to a magazinge which
keeps badmouthing them

"Eric M. Bennett" wrote:
> 
> Christopher Pall wrote:
> 
> >What surprises me is that for a company which seems to realize that perception
> >is 90% reality, they have failed to up to this point realize that the public
> >perception has radically oppositional views towards Microsoft. Like I said in
> >the other post, I think some executives with less invested in Microsoft
> >winning
> >the court case are hoping to make out in the settlement.
> 
> I know general public opinion of MS has soured... but "radically
> oppositional"?  I wouldn't go that far.
> 
> --
> Eric Bennett ( http://www.pobox.com/~ericb/ )
> Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Cornell University
> 377 Olin Chemistry Lab
> 
> A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is
> nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
> -  Antoine de Saint-Exup'ery