[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Common Control DLL and MSIE4.0 distribution
The following is a letter by Brian Glaeske, a software developer, to the
US DOJ, regarding the Common Control DLL. Microsoft's licensing
requires developers who want to distribute this DLL to also distribute
MSIE4.0
The URL for the license is:
http://www.microsoft.com/msdn/sdk/inetsdk/help/itt/IEProg/Licensing.htm#ch_MSHTML_licensing
The letter follows:
-----------------------------
Subject: Microsoft Antitrust
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 11:51:37 -0600
From: Brian Glaeske <bglaeske@cogs.gps.com>
Organization: Great Plains Software
To: "'antitrust@usdoj.gov'" <antitrust@usdoj.gov>
Joel I. Klein
Assistant Attorney General
Antitrust Division
U.S. Department of Justice
Washington, DC
antitrust@usdoj.gov
Dear Mr. Klein:
I am writing to ask the Department of Justice (DOJ) to protect consumers
by taking action to prevent Microsoft from using anticompetitive
practices to monopolize the market for Internet browsers. Specifically,
Microsoft should not be permitted to force third party developers to
redistribute Microsoft Internet Explorer in order to use features found
in a programming API (Application Program Interface).
A specific API shipped originally with the Microsoft Windows 95 OS
(Operating System) and was just recently enhanced with new features that
make it attractive for third party developers to use. This API is known
to developers as the Common Control DLL. Because this is an enhancement
to the OS that came after the initial release of Microsoft Windows 95,
it is necessary for third party developers to distribute the updated OS
components with their software in order to ensure that their software
works properly. However, Microsoft is not allowing developers to
redistribute only the components that they need, instead Microsoft is
demanding that Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0 is distributed with the
third party software
It is the responsibility of DOJ to ensure that Microsoft does not use
its OS monopoly to monopolize the market for applications. I believe
that forcing third party developers to distribute Microsoft Internet
Explorer is a blatant anti-competitive act.
Sincerely,
Brian Glaeske
1539 14th St. S.
Fargo, ND 58103-4001
bglaeske@cogs.gps.com