[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Brave New World
At 12:59 AM 11/15/97 -0500, you wrote:
>** Reply to note from cswiger@widomaker.com Fri, 14 Nov 1997 16:02:52
-0500 (EST)
>
>
>Does that also mention that Gates came away with a contract
>with South Africa to set up computer technology centers in
>South Africa -- that will run Microsoft software, and teach the
>Microsoft Way to students? Let's here it all, not just a small
>part.
That's a very legit concern of privitization of standards. Perhaps
the now 17 yr. old mantra of "Get Govt. off our backs!" has run it's
course and the National Inst. of Standards and Technology should be
tasked w/ creating/monitoring/enforcing an OS API standard, like POSIX
or something. Of course this is in a country still on the English
system of weights and measures, along with Burma and one other country.
To widen that idea a bit, someone once pointed out - in reguard to
the NEA funding of offensive art - that, in effect' "He who pays
the piper calls the tune" (or is that "he who calls the tune pays
the piper"?). Basically meaning that any entity who funds a project
expects to exert some control over the content, whether it's a
dictionary entry or what. I'd hardly expect to find an article in
one of Rupert Murdoch's newspapers stating that "MURDOCH USES
NONCOMPETITIVE TACTICS IN ACQUIRING NEW YORK NEWSPAPERS", or expect
to find Phillip Morris funding an artist who paints pictures of
lung cancer.
While we could hardly expect a donation w/ strings attached to
obtain OS/2 systems, I guess your right, a real humanitarian
would ask that it be used to buy food/clothing/shelter or just
math textsbooks to avoid any appearence of conflict of interest.
Thanks for a most enlightening discussion.
Chuck
cswiger@widomaker.com