[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nader Conference?
Erick responded in private mail and clarified.
Yes, there were two (that I know of) Microsoft PR flacks in the hallways
chatting up reporters. John Pinette, public relations manager out of
Redmond, and a younger fellow who was with him. The younger guy might have
been with Microsoft's PR firm. Dunno.
As a reporter, I'm glad the MSFT flacks were there. They weren't intrusive,
and they provided a good balance to the NaderFesting.
Full disclosure: Pinette offered to take some of us out to dinner, a common
practice where (depending on company policies) reporters often pay for
their own meals. The Silicon Valley reporter crowd went drinking instead (I
think, since they never showed). I stopped by the dinner briefly with some
friends -- I would have stayed but I had to to a TV show at 9 pm. The only
two reporters who I saw, though some might have showed after I left, were
from Washington state newspapers.
At 23:19 -0500 11/14/97, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>Guess you weren't there. I don't understand your message, BTW. It's
>No reporters I know are aligned to the Microsoft camp. A very, very few are
>paid by Microsoft, like MSNBC folks, but they try to do a good job of
>critical reporting anyway. All the reporters I know -- and I know a bunch
>-- are suspicious of the power of large corporations, including Microsoft.
>And Microsoft's enemies too.
>At 23:11 -0500 11/14/97, Erick Andrews wrote:
>>On Fri, 14 Nov 1997 18:57:27 -0500 (EST), Declan McCullagh wrote:
>>>Yep. Yesterday's panels were achingly boring. High point was the critic's
>>>noon summit (that Ralph tried to lure reporters away from by having media
>>>availability at the same time).
>>Gee, Mr McCullagh, I heard that there were so many reporters there that,
>>to be sure, Ralph Nader would have had a difficult time finding one
>>outside those aligned to (or paid by?) the MS camp. But then again,
>>I wasn't there or in the aisles.