[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Macintosh alternative?
I pose this is a question to the AntiTrust experts among us:
Based on whatever precedents might exist in other industries, just what
are the limits--if any--that govern behind the scenes collaboration
between Microsoft, and its sole commercial competitor in the end-user
desktop market?
I ask this partly in response to (probably not well informed)
observations made in computer industry publications that MS investment
in Apple was meant to forestall further antitrust action. (Though I bet
no one who published such speculation knew any more about antitrust
legislation than I do...)
Matt Benjamin
> ----------
> From: claribba[SMTP:claribba@jps.net]
> Reply To: claribba@jps.net
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 1997 11:47 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Macintosh alternative?
>
> In the San Jose Mercury on Oct 25 1997, there was an article written
> by E.
> Richards..".Redmond Empire Grows Valley Roots".
>
> There are now 800 MS employees working in the area from San Francisco
> to
> San Jose, which contains 'Silicon Valley' within its borders.
>
> Eighty of these are working at Apple, with 60 more to come aboard
> shortly.
> For those who don't already have a Macintosh and want to, they will
> now get
> a WinMac/MacWin hybrid.
>
> Bummer!
>
> Claire Macdonald
>
>
>
>
>