[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
In about Jun or Jul 1995, Infoworld ran an artical about how they were
forced to publish "good" reviews of the then Beta Win95. Earlier, they
had published a bad review and (according to the artical) the Microsoft
rep stopped visiting, the authers free beta copies stopped coming, and
information stopped coming in from Microsoft about the beta program.
Is that legal? I don't know. Is it fair? Hell no.