[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dioxins and Plants
- To: Multiple recipients of list <dioxin-l@essential.org>
- Subject: Re: Dioxins and Plants
- From: Byron Bodo <bodo@interlog.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 00:26:54 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <199801271652.AA22498@interlock.wdni.com>
>
>Not exactly true about the only reason trees give off dioxin when
>burned. Dr Gross of the University of Nebraska found dioxin in very old
>petrified trees that had burned thousands of years ago. He also found
>dioxin in the tissue of Eskimo bodies found frozen in an igloo from
>several hundred years back. The dioxin was thought to have come from
>burning wood for heat within the igloo. The chlorine source for this
>was most likely salt air from the sea, but trees do contain chlorine
>from salt uptake from the soil. I agree that the levels are higher now
>due to the organochlorines from the atmosphere.
>
>Dennis Catalano
>
There's no doubt that some of the high Kow / Koa (octanol-air
partition coefficient if anyone's actually measured such) OCs sorb into
in waxy coatings of leaves, needles, etc. & the lipids in tree bark, but
I'd expect ( & correct me if I'm wrong) that the Cl content of wood
is probably several orders higher.
Despite some claims that forest fires were major PCDD/F sources,
I've yet to see any hard evidence (e.g., dated sediment cores from remote
lakes) that confirms the assertion. Accordingly, PCDD/Fs in the ambient
environment created by natural combustion of vegetation & wood are
likely very low.
-bb