The Corporate Seminar for Judges

[Robert Weissman <rob@essential.org>]

In A Civil Action, the bestselling non-fiction book about a toxic tort
case, Harvard Law School Professor Charles Nesson plays a pivotal role. 

Jan Schlictmann, the plaintiffs' lawyer and star of the book, persuades
Nesson to join the legal team advising the residents of Woburn,
Massachusetts in their lawsuit against chemical companies for polluting
the town's drinking water supplies. 

The author of the book, Jonathan Harr, quotes Nesson as saying: "The only
lesson that corporations understand is money. Sales, income, earnings,
profit, the bottom line. That is their blood." 

Because the book has been on the best-seller list for more than two years
now, Nesson has gained a bit of a reputation as a crusading anti-corporate
lawyer. 

But don't be misled. Nesson's current work is being funded by America's
giant corporations. 

As part of the Berkman Center, Nesson has set up something called The
Daubert Project. The Daubert Project holds seminars around the country for
judges about the implications of the Supreme Court's 1993 decision in
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 

Nesson, along with fellow Harvard Law Professor Charles Fried, submitted a
friend of the court brief on behalf of the Merrell Dow's position in the
case. 

In Daubert, the plaintiffs sought to introduce evidence that birth defects
had been caused by a mother's ingestion of the anti-nausea drug Bendectin. 

Despite the fact that the Supreme Court sided with the plaintiffs in
Daubert, by setting up a process for judges to determine the reliability
and relevancy of scientific evidence, the decision gives trial judges
important powers to exclude scientific evidence and thus undermine
plaintiffs' chances in toxic tort cases. 

"The Daubert formula strikes many trial judges as a whispered invitation
to unconstitutionally invade the province of the jury in weighing the
evidence of causation in toxic tort cases," says Rob Hager, a Washington,
D.C. plaintiffs' attorney. 

Nesson's Daubert Project now is holding seminars around the country in an
effort to educate judges about their role as evidentiary gatekeepers. 

Eight such seminars have been held so far, including one in Jacksonville,
Florida titled "The Judge's Role As Gatekeeper: Responsibilities and
Powers." 

More than 300 state and federal judges from Florida attended the
Jacksonville seminar. Each received materials prepared by Nesson and his
colleagues at Harvard. On the front orange cover of the materials are the
words "Produced by The Daubert Project, Berkman Center on Law &
Technology, Harvard Law School." 

What the participants were not told is that the Daubert Project is funded
in part by a $300,000 grant from the Civil Justice Reform Group, a "tort
reform" lobby group made up of general counsel of 60 of the nation's
largest corporations. 

The Civil Justice Reform Group's operating committee is headed by Mike
Withrow, associate general counsel at Procter & Gamble. Withrow says that
Procter & Gamble has donated an additional $100,000 to the Berkman Center. 

Withrow says that his group's $300,000 donation should help cover the
costs of 10 state conferences in 1997 and an additional seven to nine
conferences that will be held in 1998. 

"All we want to do is present a balanced program," Withrow says. "We want
good science." 

Don't tell that to Christian Searcy. 

Searcy, a West Palm Beach trial attorney who was on the panel with Nesson
discussing Daubert at the Jacksonville seminar, says that going into the
event, his impression was that "the purpose of the presentation was to
have a law professor put on an objective program about evidence." 

"After participating in the program, it was my impression that Professor
Nesson was an advocate for the proposition of judges excluding expert
testimony in products liability or scientific cases," Searcy says. "The
method he conducted the program seemed to me to be slanted toward
persuading people to be more restrictive in keeping scientific evidence
out." 

"The end effect of having someone with an agenda put on a program that
purports to be academic and objective is that you mislead the audience,"
Searcy says. "It reminds you of the wolf in sheep's clothing." 

Robert Hanson works for the Florida court system and put together the
program. Hanson also was surprised to hear about The Daubert Project's
funding. 

"My impression was the program was being funded by Harvard," Hanson says. 

Nesson says that he does not tell the judges where the money for The
Daubert Project comes from. "We have just said this is a Berkman Center
project," Nesson says. "We haven't gone around advertising where the money
is coming from." 

As for any reputation of being supportive of plaintiffs in toxic tort
cases, Nesson says, "I don't think I'm on any side." 

"I want credible verdicts," he says. "If verdicts are not credible, the
whole system suffers. And in fact that is what was happening." 

Nesson says that he would be "delighted to have continuing support" from
big corporations. 

The better to see you with, my dear. 


Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime
Reporter. Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based
Multinational Monitor.

(c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman

Focus on the Corporation is a weekly column written by Russell Mokhiber
and Robert Weissman. Please feel free to forward the column to friends or
repost the column on other lists. If you would like to post the column on
a web site or publish it in print format, we ask that you first contact us
(russell@essential.org or rob@essential.org).

Focus on the Corporation is distributed to individuals on the listserve
corp-focus@essential.org. To subscribe to corp-focus, send an e-mail
message to list-proc@essential.org with the following all in one line:

subscribe corp-focus <your name> (no period).

Focus on the Corporation columns are posted on the Multinational Monitor
web site <www.essential.org/monitor>.

Postings on corp-focus are limited to the columns. If you would like to
comment on the columns, send a message to russell@essential.org or
rob@essential.org.