Archive of Postings to AM-INFO Sorted by Thread

• Date Index

• Re: Gates claims not to know why Sun is suing MS, (continued)
  • Re: Gates claims not to know why Sun is suing MS, Mitch Stone
    • Re: Gates claims not to know why Sun is suing MS, Joseph F. Moore
    • Re: Gates claims not to know why Sun is suing MS, Wandered Inn
  • Re: Gates claims not to know why Sun is suing MS, Norm
    • Re: Gates claims not to know why Sun is suing MS, Eric Bennett
      • Re: Gates claims not to know why Sun is suing MS, Doug Masson
      • Re: Gates claims not to know why Sun is suing MS, Eric Bennett
      • Re: Gates claims not to know why Sun is suing MS, Norm
      • Re: Gates claims not to know why Sun is suing MS, Norm
  • Re: Gates claims not to know why Sun is suing MS, Mitch Stone
  • Re: Gates claims not to know why Sun is suing MS, Dan Strychalski
• Dave Farber, James Love
• Microsoft response to McIntosh discussion of Front Page Extensions, James Love
  • Re: Microsoft response to McIntosh discussion of Front Page Extensions, Mark Hinds
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Microsoft response to McIntosh discussion of Front Page Extensions, Mitch Stone
• Doubletalk, Eric Bennett
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Doubletalk, Mitch Stone
• Standardization and Diversity, Dan Strychalski
  • Re: Standardization and Diversity, Eric M. Bennett
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Standardization and Diversity, Mitch Stone
    • Re: Standardization and Diversity, Joseph F. Moore
    • Re: Standardization and Diversity, Eric M. Bennett
  • Re: Standardization and Diversity, Mitch Stone
  • Re: Standardization and Diversity, Dan Strychalski
    • Re: Standardization and Diversity, Steve Cohen
  • Re: Standardization and Diversity, Dan Strychalski
• Articles by Clay Shirky, Dan Strychalski
• [Fwd: Follow up on "lying with statistics"], Wandered Inn
• smile....., Mike Stephen
• the Czar, Marx, Lenin and Stalin, James Love
  • From Red Revolution to Star Wars, etc, Ben Drasin
    • Re: From Red Revolution to Star Wars, etc, Brett Glass
      • Re: From Red Revolution to Star Wars, etc, Mark Hinds
  • Re: the Czar, Marx, Lenin and Stalin, Case Roole
• Free Software, Commercial Software, James Love
  • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, Steve Cohen
    • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, Brett Glass
      • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, Steve Cohen
      • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, Brett Glass
      • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, Eric Bennett
      • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, Steve Cohen
      • Re:Is DOJ Case moot? A proposed OOC settlement., Glenn T. Livezey, Ph.D.
  • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, Brett Glass
    • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, James Love
      • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, Eric M. Bennett
      • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, James Love
      • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, Eric Bennett
      • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, James Love
      • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, Sujal Shah
    • Why free software may not kill the software industry., Sujal Shah
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, stan johnson
  • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, Mitch Stone
    • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, James Love
  • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, Mitch Stone
    • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, James Love
  • Re: Free Software, Commercial Software, P.A. Petricone
• Mexico Avoids Monopoly Tax, Charles Behney
• Microsoft, Gateway, Compaq and Intel want telephone monopoly, too, Brett Glass
• Microsoft moves deeper into cable, James Love
• Eric Raymond responds to post on am-info, James Love
• State drops lawsuit against MS, Eric M. Bennett
• Re: Microsoft, Gateway, Compaq and Intel want telephone monopoly,, stan johnson
• Score one for Microsoft, Joel Simons Sys_Admin
  • Re: Score one for Microsoft, Brett Glass
    • Re: Score one for Microsoft, John J. Urbaniak
      • Re: Score one for Microsoft, Brett Glass
  • Re: Score one for Microsoft, Norm
    • Re: Score one for Microsoft, Erick Andrews
      • Re: Score one for Microsoft, Ken Hamlett
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Score one for Microsoft, Brett Glass
  • Re: Score one for Microsoft, Bill G. Riel
    • Re: Score one for Microsoft, James Love
  • Re: Score one for Microsoft, Mitch Stone
• Gates on the antitrust suit, Mark Hinds
• It's not the browser, James Love
• Who is the heck Eolas?, Mitch Stone
  • Re: Who is the heck Eolas?, Mike Jamison
  • Re: Who is the heck Eolas?, Christopher Pall
  • Re: Who is the heck Eolas?, Christopher Pall
    • Re: Who is the heck Eolas?, Steve Cohen
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Who is the heck Eolas?, Dan Strychalski
    • Re: Who is the heck Eolas?, Christopher Pall
      • Re: When pigs fly first class (postage), Glenn T. Livezey, Ph.D.
      • Re: When pigs fly first class (postage), Erick Andrews
      • Re: When pigs fly first class (postage), Eric M. Bennett
• Very cool web resource, James Love
• the international scene, Wendy
• Microsoft: OEM choice would be a "disaster", Brett Glass
  • Re: Microsoft: OEM choice would be a "disaster", Christopher Pall
    • Re: Microsoft: OEM choice would be a "disaster", Eric M. Bennett
    • Re: Microsoft: OEM choice would be a "disaster", Steve Cohen
      • Re: Microsoft: OEM choice would be a "disaster", ethical
      • Re: Microsoft: OEM choice would be a "disaster", Christopher Pall
  • Re: Microsoft: OEM choice would be a "disaster", Eric M. Bennett
  • Re: Microsoft: OEM choice would be a "disaster", Steve Cohen
    • Re: Microsoft: OEM choice would be a "disaster", Christopher Pall
      • Re: Microsoft: OEM choice would be a "disaster", Steve Cohen
    • Re: Microsoft: OEM choice would be a "disaster", Brett Glass
  • Re: Microsoft: OEM choice would be a "disaster", Doug Masson
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Microsoft: OEM choice would be a "disaster", MarkCooper