Re: persons?

[Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>]

At 22:15 -0400 4/22/98, Sujal Shah wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Chris Pall wrote:
>
>> an article - not the NYT. It's content that is censored, not presses. The
>> government couldn't "stop" the presses either because it's a property issue.
>> Nor search and siezure since the presses are owned by people - not a
>>company.
>> In fact, corporations are easier to corrupt since there is a clear line of
>> command. Spread ownership and responsibility througout and you've got
>> distributed power.
>>
>
>Umm, I don't think the author owns the copyright of the article.
>
>In fact, I can't think of too many places where the company doesn't own
>the rights of things written on it's behalf (i.e. software).
>

Correct. Chris' post is incoherent. I do not, for instance, own the
copyright on articles I write for time.com.

-Declan