[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Judges sympathetic to Microsoft
*******
http://cgi.pathfinder.com/time/daily/0,1237,101980421-microcourt,00.htm
time.com / TIME Daily
April 21, 1998
WASHINGTON: Score round two to Microsoft? A Federal panel heard the
software firm's unbundling appeal Tuesday with a sympathetic ear. "The
judges were more critical of the Justice Department," says TIME Daily
Washington correspondent Declan McCullagh, "interrupting each other to
quiz the government's lawyer." Nor were the omens good for Judge
Thomas Penfield Jackson, who made the original order that Microsoft
disentangle Internet Explorer from Windows 95. "That's not the way we
hand out preliminary injunctions up here," warned Judge Patricia Wald
-- who is, in normal circumstances, a big fan of antitrust law.
All in all, the judges were surprisingly tech-minded, offering
lawyers on both sides an esoteric pop quiz. Is Internet Explorer
integrated or bundled? Has any computer manufacturer taken advantage
of the unbundling order? (No, shrugged the DOJ). And most importantly,
how big will the Windows 95 market be after the June 25 release of
Windows 98? For Judge Wald, that question was rhetorical: "It's going
to be minuscule." Which means that whatever the appeals court rules in
the next three months, it may not matter anyway. If the DOJ is indeed
planning a wider antitrust case, it had better hurry up. --Chris Taylor
********
http://cgi.pathfinder.com/netly/afternoon/0,1012,1918,00.html
time.com / The Netly News / Afternoon Line
April 21, 1998
Lone Justice
Scoring court hearings, let alone predicting winners, is always a
chancy business. Every trial attorney can spin yarns of surprise
upsets -- and upsetting surprises. But if this morning's oral
arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia is any indication, Microsoft is going to win the second round
in its legal battle with the Department of Justice. The three appeals
court judges repeatedly jabbed pointed questions at Douglas Melamed,
principal deputy assistant attorney general for antitrust, sometimes
interrupting each other in their eagerness. What was the point, asked
Judge Stephen F. Williams, of the lower court's order, anyway? Did any
computer manufacturers take advantage of Microsoft's
not-exactly-voluntary offer to sell the browser front end without
Windows 95? No, Melamed admitted. Judge Patricia Wald wondered if the
current legal tussle was pointless. "Once Windows 98 hits the market,
will there be any market for Windows 95?" Replied Melamed: "I don't
know." Wald did. "It's going to be very minuscule," she predicted.
Williams also said that since Windows 95 and Internet Explorer share a
lot of the same code, it "seems to me to be kind of integrated." Ouch.
This can hardly be encouraging news for U.S. District Judge Thomas
Penfield Jackson, the author of the order in question. Even if the
appeals court nixes Jackson's injunction, as now seems likely, the
case is far from over. The panel could tell Jackson to continue with
the case -- this time much more carefully. --By Declan
McCullagh/Washington
Suit of the Century
As the millennium and its bug approach, high tech companies are
starting to get nervous about their liability if their best efforts to
eradicate the bug should fail and serious problems ensue. It's no
surprise then that a group of tech companies is rallying behind a
California state assembly bill that would protect them from punitive
damages in the event of lawsuits arising form Y2K disruptions. Note
that this does not eliminate their exposure by any means, since it
would not apply to actual damages and would cover them only if they
could show that they had made a demonstrable, good faith effort to
overcome the glitch. What the industry fears almost more than an
actual Y2K disaster is packs of lawyers smelling rich high tech blood,
and with a ZD survey showing that only 17 percent of companies are
currently prepared for the bug, there is clearly cause for
trepidation. [By Jonathan Gregg]
[...snip...]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology
To subscribe: send a message to majordomo@vorlon.mit.edu with this text:
subscribe politech
More information is at http://www.well.com/~declan/politech/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------