[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Microsoft still considering image makeover plan



Sure why should they do otherwise? It's not like the public is the
government, the public can't force Microsoft not to lie....

Kris Shapar wrote:

> I found this story on one of my Net news services. So even though the
> PR campaign has already exploded in MS's face, they still are
> actively considering going ahead with it, insisting it's their right.
>
> ************************************************
>
> Microsoft still considering image makeover plan
>
> April 15, 1998
>
> PC Week via NewsEdge Corporation : Microsoft Corp. has acknowledged
> not only that it is actively considering a public-image make-over plan
> developed by an international public relations firm but also said that
> it's acting within its rights to do so.
>
> "We need to tell our story better at a local level," said Greg Shaw, a
> Microsoft corporate spokesman. "We want to be responsive and go out
> and tell our story."
>
> Shaw said Microsoft is considering possibly employing all or parts of
> a media campaign designed for it by Edelman Public Relations
> Worldwide, a company that has done work for the Redmond, Wash.,
> corporation in the past. Members of Microsoft's regional offices
> assembled in Chicago today to discuss the plan, a draft of which
> Edelman has presented to Microsoft. Edelman proposed the plan to
> Microsoft to help it combat negative public perceptions stemming from
> its ongoing and much publicized battle with the U.S. Department of
> Justice's antitrust investigation.
>
> According to Friday's issue of The Los Angeles Times, Edelman proposed
> planting articles, letters to the editor and other opinion pieces that
> would be commissioned by Microsoft's top media handlers but presented
> as spontaneous testimonials.
>
> "The idea that we'd hire people who wouldn't identify themselves as
> representing Microsoft is totally false," said Shaw. "Actually, the
> proposal we received is quite mundane."
>
> Shaw would not comment on when or if Microsoft might adopt the Edelman
> plan. "But there are no other such plans we are considering at this
> time," he added.
>
> Sources close to Microsoft who have watched the company's public
> relations efforts evolve over the years also downplayed the
> significance of the Edelman plan.
>
> "This kind of [public affairs] plan is just new to this industry. It's
> part of the standard arsenal of companies in the cable and TV
> industry, and in other industries where there's government
> regulation," said one source, adding, "The [Edelman] plan is pretty
> garden-variety stuff. It just seems unusual in our industry, which has
> focused on marketing and product promotion. Contrary to popular
> belief, Microsoft's not currently on the offensive. It's scrambling.
> Every time Microsoft is going in one senator's door, the competition
> is on its way out."
>
> But individuals on a variety of Internet sites and newsgroups that
> have been monitoring Microsoft's efforts to remake its public image do
> not view the Edelman plan as run-of-the-mill public relations. A
> number of posters expressed outrage and dismay after learning of the
> charges in the Los Angeles Times story.
>
> <<PC Week -- 04-13-98>>
>
> [Copyright 1998, Ziff Wire]
>
> Kris Shapar
> ____________________________________________________________________
>
> On two occasions I have been asked [by members of Parliament!], "Pray,
> Mr.  Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right
> answers come out?"  I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of
> confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.
>
>                 Charles Babbage
> ____________________________________________________________________

 

--
--------------------------------------------------------------
                       Christopher Pall
                      ThinkBiz, DPS, WMU
                       Ann Arbor, MI USA

                      x97pall@wmich.edu
       http://members.tripod.com/~ChrisPall/index.html
--------------------------------------------------------------