[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
CPT: EchoStar, TCI and ownership of Canadian DBS frequencies
- To: tap-info@tap.org
- Subject: CPT: EchoStar, TCI and ownership of Canadian DBS frequencies
- From: James Love <love@Essential.ORG>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 17:52:42 -0400 (EDT)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
TAP-INFO - An Internet newsletter available from listproc@tap.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------
INFORMATION POLICY NOTE - DBS Concentration
April 16, 1996
- The following is a letter sent to the FCC by CPT to express
new concerns about concentration of ownership of Direct
Broadcast Satellite (DBS) frequencies.
- The letter is a response to recent efforts by TCI, the large
cable operator, and EchoStar, the firm that currently controls
the largest chunk of U.S. frequencies for DBS, to acquire control
over DBS frequencies that have been assigned to the Canadian
government, but which will likely be used to broadcast to U.S.
consumers.
- Jargon: The letter makes references to full-CONUS or partial-CONUS
frequencies for DBS. CONUS is a term used by the FCC to describe
full or partial coverage of the Continental US (CONUS). Each DBS
frequency can be used to broadcast several "channels" of
Television, or other types of data.
Todd Paglia (tpaglia@tap.org) is working on this for us. The
letter follows. jamie love (love@tap.org; 202/387-8030)
Consumer Project on Technology
P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036
202/387-8030; Fax 202/234-5176
http://www.essential.org/cpt
April 16, 1996
The Honorable Reed Hundt
Chairman
Federal Communications Commission
1919 M Street, N.W., Room 814
Washington, D.C. 20554
Re: EchoStar or TCI's Attempts to Acquire Canadian DBS
Orbital Positions to broadcast in the United States
Dear Chairman Hundt:
We are writing to express our concern over reports that
EchoStar and TCI are seeking to acquire control over a
substantial number of full-CONUS DBS frequencies which are
assigned to the Canadian government, and to ask the FCC to
review rules which concern the impact of broadcasting to the
United States from the Canadian DBS orbital positions.
In our earlier April 5, 1996 letter (attachment), we
expressed concerns about efforts by EchoStar to acquire
frequencies now controlled by the Direct Broadcast Satellite
Corporation-Delaware, which would give EchoStar 90 out of
the 256 DBS frequencies available in the U.S, including 23
percent of all US full-CONUS frequencies, and 43 percent of
all US partial-CONUS frequencies. We also expressed our
concerns about TCI or other large U.S. cable operators
acquiring DBS frequencies, because this will lead to too
much concentration of ownership in the market for cable and
DBS video programming, hurting consumers and unaffiliated
programmers.
We raise these concerns again, in a different context.
According to recent press reports and Commission filings,
both EchoStar and TCI have engaged in discussions with firms
that control full-CONUS DBS frequencies which are assigned
to the Canadian government. If either EchoStar or TCI (or
any other large US cable operator such as Time-Warner or
U.S. West) is permitted to obtain the Canadian DBS
frequencies to serve the U.S. market, the FCC should
consider the impact of such action on concentration in the
U.S. market.
In the case of EchoStar, consider the concentration of
full-CONUS frequencies. Currently EchoStar controls 22 of 96
US full-CONUS frequencies. EchoStar is seeking to acquire
or gain control over 32 of the 64 Canadian full-CONUS
frequencies. This would give EchoStar control over 54 of
the 160 combined U.S. and Canadian full-CONUS frequencies,
or about 34 percent of the total.[1]
If permitted, these acquisitions will give EchoStar
enormous market power. As noted in our earlier letter and
pleadings, EchoStar is also holding discussions with TCI and
other large telecommunications giants about possible
strategic alliances or mergers, leading to even further
concentration. We are alarmed that such aggregations of
frequencies will greatly diminish the role of DBS as a new
competitor to cable television.
The Commission can and should address the impact of
broadcasting to U.S. consumers from the Canadian
frequencies. Specifically, the Commission should limit the
number of U.S. DBS frequencies that any firm should be
permitted to own or control, so consumers will benefit from
more competition. And in determining those limits, the
Commission should consider ownership or control over the
Canadian frequencies, if those frequencies are used to
broadcast to U.S. consumers.
Submitted: April 16, 1996,
__________________ __________________
James Love Todd J. Paglia
Director Staff Attorney
Consumer Project on Technology
PO Box 19367
Washington, DC 20036
cc: The Honorable James H. Quello
The Honorable Rachelle B. Chong
The Honorable Susan Ness
[1] As noted in our earlier filings, EchoStar is seeking to
increase its holdings of U.S. partial- CONUS frequencies from
46 to 68, which would give EchoStar control over 43 percent of
U.S. partial-CONUS frequencies
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
INFORMATION POLICY NOTES is a free Internet newsletter sponsored
by the Taxpayer Assets Project (TAP) and the Consumer Project on
Technology (CPT). Both groups are projects of the Center for
Study of Responsive Law, which is run by Ralph Nader. The
LISTPROC services are provide by Essential Information. Archives
of TAP-INFO are available from
http://www.essential.org/listproc/tap-info/
TAP and CPT both have Internet Web pages.
http://www.tap.org
http://www.essential.org/cpt
Subscription requests to tap-info to listproc@tap.org with
the message: subscribe tap-info your name
TAP and CPT can both be reached off the net at P.O. Box 19367,
Washington, DC 20036, Voice: 202/387-8030; Fax: 202/234-5176
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++