[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
uk sewage effect querry
>The following mail was misaddressed:
>i received a handful of responses to my querry about the new uk Env.
>Agency's report on estrogenic chemicals in sewage & receiving waters. much
>appreciated. the intent here tho was for people w/ answers to post it *to
>the list*, where i & **others** can see it!!! eg susan snow sent me,
>inter alia, a couple good web sites i hadn't seen, one with good stuff on
>non-halogenated endocrine disrupters.
>
>wrt to pete roche's summary of the Env. Agency's press release (alan
>jackson sent me the whole thing, implying but not mentioning, as i believe
>from watching _assaoult on the male_, that natural estrogens and residues
>of the pill had both been ruled out in controlled lab tests w/ trout, and
>that alkyl phenols had been implicated. ... now they seem to be back to the
>same fraudulent science the uk govt had been up to when the story 1st
>broke. haven't read the new study, but i know which results i'd be more
>critical of!