[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
to avoid dioxin and repeated consultations by environmentalists...
- To: Multiple recipients of list <dioxin-l@essential.org>
- Subject: to avoid dioxin and repeated consultations by environmentalists...
- From: "Susan K. Snow" <sksnow@1stnet.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 1996 21:41:31 -0700
- Organization: Pollution Solution
Dear Multiple recipients of dioxin list,
Two years ago, our daughter attended the University of Edinburgh, Scotland
where she learned, among other things, that the paper which came from Sweden
was bleached without chlorine (or chlorine-dioxide). Instead, the Swedish
pulp and paper industry used hydrogen peroxide to lighten pulp and paper,
hence, no dioxin or other organochlorines. It is my understanding that the
paper manufacturers in the U.S. and Canada have the technology to do the
same, but won't. Apparently, they would rather pay off lawmakers and battle
with those concerned about their children's stolen future.
For this reason, I buy totally chlorine-free Kenaf paper for my printing and
writing needs. However, Kenaf is not available to everything. Therefore, to
reduce the dioxin from entering the environment, I purchase 100 percent
recycled, 100% post-consumer paper. It still contains dioxins, but does not
add more into the environment, I'm told.
Those who think life begins and ends with the abortion issue cannot tell the
forest from the trees. Many lives cannot be born because they cannot be
conceived or carried to term; other lives are simply damaged or spontaneously
aborted after conception from certaom petrochemicals in the environment. The
same petrochemicals that are released during the manufacture, use, and
disposal of things we all use.
I for one, would be delighted to go back to durable, reusable materials. For
example, sterilized glass milk bottles instead of HDPE; syringes, metal bed
pans instead of chlorinated plastics. By purchasing durable, reusable
products that are not made from chlorinated chemicals illnesses would go
down, hospital wastes would be reduced, and the waste and petrochemical
industry would destroy less of the planet and the world's food chains. I
support waste prevention; rather than reduction by means of incineration for
energy recovery. That's why I dropped my local newspaper, opting instead to
pick it up at the library.
I support life, rather than the right for polluters to poison us for profit.
Susan K Snow