[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Hopkins dioxin model
Topic 837 Risk Model Identifies Safe Exposure
ewire EWire 10:21 PM Feb 27, 1996
TO NATIONAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH/MEDICAL EDITORS:
RISK MODEL IDENTIFIES SAFE LEVEL OF CHEMICAL EXPOSURE
BALTIMORE, Feb. 27 -/E-Wire/-- Using a new model of risk
assessment, researchers at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health
have identified a safe level of exposure to the nongenotoxic
carcinogen dioxin. This knowledge could help scientists determine
whether people are being exposed to an unsafe, or potentially
carcinogenic, level of the toxin. The study is reported in the
December 1995 issue of "Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology,"
released today.
Nongenotoxic carcinogens stimulate cell receptors that cause
enzymatic changes in the cell. These changes, in turn, may cause a
series of other cellular events, eventually resulting in cancer.
Lead author Thomas Sutter, Ph.D., assistant professor of
environmental health sciences at the School, said that in the United
States, other commonly used models of risk assessment for these types
of carcinogens are inappropriate because they presume that cancer
occurs as a domino effect: a direct result of chemical activation of
cell receptors. This implies that health hazards exist at any amount
of exposure.
"Our model is unique because it embodies an understanding of the
receptor process. As a result, it shows that below a certain level,
dioxin does not cause harm," said Dr. Sutter.
According to this new model, tissue concentrations of dioxin
below 2.5 parts per trillion are unlikely to harm people. Current
human exposure levels for dioxin and dioxin-like chemicals are about
1 and 10 parts per trillion, respectively. Humans may be close to a
level of dioxin exposure at which biological changes are likely to
occur. This model offers hope that scientists could find out for
sure.
"We now know that people are safe below a certain amount of
exposure," Dr. Sutter explained. "We also know that enzymatic
changes occur above these levels. We currently have the tools to
measure those changes, so we should be able to determine whether
current levels are truly dangerous."
-0-
/CONTACT: Lisbeth Pettengill or Sharon
Rippey of the Johns Hopkins School of Public
Health, 410-955-6878/
Conf?