Archive of Postings to MED-PRIVACY Sorted by Thread

• Date Index

• Law enforcement's use of medical records, Andy Oram
• Re: Controversy Over Medical Records Legislation (fwd), James Love
• Re: Controversy Over Medical Records Legislation, James Love
• privacy and HIV/AIDS, James Love
  • Re: privacy and HIV/AIDS, Jennifer L Aranza
• Bennet-Leahy legislation (fwd), James Love
• consent under s. 1360, James Love
  • Re: consent under s. 1360, James Love
• Section 112 accounting for disclosures, James Love
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Section 112 accounting for disclosures, Deirdre Mulligan
    • Re: Section 112 Account - response to reponse, James Love
• Health Privacy Background, Robert Gellman
  • Re: Health Privacy Background, James Love
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: Health Privacy Background, Plesser, Ron - DC
• Health Privacy Legislation - Part II, Robert Gellman
• server down since wed, James Love
• CPT Comments on S. 1360 - November 14, 1995, James Love
  • Re: CPT Comments on S. 1360 - November 14, 1995, Robert Gellman
• AHIMA takes credit for Bennett Medical Records Act, James Love
• Re: S. 1360 - Medical Privacy - CPT statement for today's hearing, James Love
  • Re: S. 1360 - Medical Privacy - CPT statement for today's hearing, Robert Gellman
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: S. 1360 - Medical Privacy - CPT statement for today's hearing, James Love
• Today's NYT's, W. Curtiss Priest
• Re: S. 1360 - Medical Priva, Marc Rotenberg
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: S. 1360 - Medical Priva, Marc Rotenberg
  • Re: S. 1360 - Medical Priva, ahlewis
  • Re: S. 1360 - Medical Priva, Deirdre Mulligan
    • Re: S. 1360 - Medical Priva, James Love
  • Re: S. 1360 - Medical Priva, Marc Rotenberg
• Health Privacy Legislation - Part III, Robert Gellman
  • Re: Health Privacy Legislation - Part III, James Love
• Medical Records Privacy (fwd), James Love
• Medical Information Bureau, W. Curtiss Priest
  • Re: Medical Information Bureau, James Love
    • Re: Medical Information Bureau, Robert Gellman
      • Re: Medical Information Bureau, James Love
      • Re: Medical Information Bureau, Robert Gellman
      • Re: Medical Information Bureau, James Love
      • Re: Medical Information Bureau, Robert Gellman
      • Consent and Access to Medical Records, James Love
      • Re: Consent and Access to Medical Records, Robert Gellman
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Medical Information Bureau, W. Curtiss Priest
    • Re: Medical Information Bureau, Mike Rudnick
  • Re: Medical Information Bureau, James Love
• Draft Privacy Rulemaking- Vermont, Stephen Whitaker
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Draft Privacy Rulemaking- Vermont, ahlewis
• Re: Medical Information Bur, Marc Rotenberg
• Medical Privacy News Clips... S. 1360 (fwd), James Love
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Medical Privacy News Clips... S. 1360 (fwd), James Love
• wash post endorses S. 1360 - sort of, James Love
• medcards, Michael Sicher
• NYT endorses S. 1360, sort of too, James Love
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: NYT endorses S. 1360, sort of too, JWRCLUM
    • Re: NYT endorses S. 1360, sort of too, James Love
• Health Privacy Legislation - Part IV, Robert Gellman
• CPT letters to NYT, James Love
  • nyt letters fax isn't 212-556-3522, James Love
  • Re: CPT letters to NYT, Robert Gellman
    • Re: CPT letters to NYT, James Love
      • Re: CPT letters to NYT, Robert Gellman
      • Re: CPT letters to NYT, Stanton McCandlish
      • Re: CPT letters to NYT, Gordon Cook
      • Re: CPT letters to NYT, Robert Gellman
• CPT letter to Washington Post, James Love
• Notes on Industry Support for S. 1360, James Love
  • Re: Notes on Industry Support for S. 1360, Robert Gellman
    • Re: Notes on Industry Support for S. 1360, James Love
    • Re: Notes on Industry Support for S. 1360, Stanton McCandlish
      • Re: Notes on Industry Support for S. 1360, Robert Gellman
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Notes on Industry Support for S. 1360, AGENTLE
    • Re: Notes on Industry Support for S. 1360, Robert Gellman
• Corporate Crime and CDT Funding on behalf of so-called medical privacy, Gordon Cook
• Why IBM is interested (fwd), James Love
• Where CDT and 1360 leads us - description of Health data base palnned for washington state, Gordon Cook
  • Re: Where CDT and 1360 leads us - description of Health data base palnned for washington state, Robert Gellman
• Re: CPT Comments on S. 1360 - November 14, 1995 (fwd), James Love
  • Re: CPT Comments on S. 1360 - November 14, 1995 (fwd), Stanton McCandlish
• Bob Gellman and me, James Love
  • Re: Bob Gellman and me, Robert Gellman
    • Re: Bob Gellman and me, James Love
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Bob Gellman and me, Marc Rotenberg
  • Re: Bob Gellman and me, ahlewis
    • Re: Bob Gellman and me, Robert Gellman
• No Subject, Deirdre Mulligan
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • No Subject, Gordon Cook
• Re:, Marc Rotenberg
• Re: Rewarding the sharks, AGENTLE
  • Re: Rewarding the sharks, Robert Gellman
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Rewarding the sharks, JWRCLUM
    • Re: Rewarding the sharks, James Love
      • Re: Rewarding the sharks, Robert Gellman
  • Re: Rewarding the sharks, Deirdre Mulligan
• Re: Thomas and GPO Access (fwd), James Brady
  • Re: Thomas and GPO Access (fwd), James Love
    • who pre-empts whom, James Love
• Are Patient Records an Economic Commodity?, James Brady
  • Re: Are Patient Records an Economic Commodity?, James Love
• Re: Alan Lewis on Bob Gellman and me, James Brady
• Questions about the bill, Dick Mills
  • Re: Questions about the bill, Robert Gellman