[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Health Privacy Legislation - Part II



This is the second in a series of postings with excerpts from
studies of health privacy.  These studies show uniformly that
health records have inadequate legal protection today.  

     From "Protecting Privacy in Computerized Medical
Information" by the Office of Technology Assessment (1993):

          There is tremendous variation in the number and
     quality of State laws on medical confidentiality. 
     While it may be difficult to generalize about the
     adequacy of State medical confidentiality laws, a
     report of the Committee on Government Operations of the
     House of Representatives concluded in 1980 that "most
     States do not have well defined, modern laws on the
     confidentiality of medical records."  A survey of State
     statutes governing privacy in medical records published
     by Robert Ellis Smith emphasizes this point.

          <begin italics> These statutes, however, do not address
     the flow of medical information to secondary users outside
     the treatment process who are deemed to legitimately have
     access to the information.  They do not address the
     responsibilities of third-party payers in handling this
     information, nor do they impose rules about the use of
     medical information by secondary users of that data: 
     parties that use medical records for nonmedical purposes. 
     This patchwork of law addressing the question of privacy in
     personal medical data is inadequate to guide the health care
     industry in carrying out its obligations in a computerized
     environment. <end italics>

         *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

          <begin italics> Legal and ethical principles currently
     available to guide the health care industry with respect to
     obligations to protect the confidentiality of patient
     information are inadequate to address privacy issues in a
     computerized environment that allows for intra- and
     interstate exchange of information of research, insurance
     and patient care purposes.  Lack of legislation in this area
     will leave the health care industry with little sense as to
     their responsibilities for maintaining confidentiality.  It
     also allows for a proliferation of private sector computer
     databases and data exchanges without regulation, statutory
     guidance, or recourse for persons wronged by abuse of data.
     <end italics>

          The scheme, as it exists, does not adequately take into
     account the tremendous outward flow of information generated
     in the health care relationship today . . . .  This problem
     has always existed, but was not serious because medical
     records were only occasionally used outside the medical
     treatment process.  <begin italics>  The expanded use of
     medical records for nontreatment purposes exacerbates the
     shortcomings of existing legal schemes to protect privacy in
     patient information.  The law must address the increase in
     the flow of data outward from the medical care relationship
     by both addressing the question of appropriate access to
     data and providing redress to those that have been wronged
     by privacy violations.  Lack of such guidelines, and failure
     to make them enforceable could affect the quality and
     integrity of the medical record itself. <end italics>

Comment:  The health privacy situation today is awful and it is
getting worse.  In the absence of new legislation, new and
expanded uses of health records will continue to expand in a
largely uncontrolled fashion.  Private, computerized databases
are unregulated and are growing.


+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+   Robert Gellman          rgellman@cais.com   +
+   Privacy and Information Policy Consultant   +
+   431 Fifth Street S.E.                       +    
+   Washington, DC 20003                        + 
+   202-543-7923 (phone)   202-547-8287 (fax)   +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +