[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Controversy Over Medical Records Legislation
- To: Scott Armstrong <sarmst@cni.org>
- Subject: Re: Controversy Over Medical Records Legislation
- From: James Love <love@tap.org>
- Date: Mon, 6 Nov 1995 03:50:16 -0500 (EST)
- cc: med-privacy@tap.org
- In-Reply-To: <9511040321.AA24974@a.cni.org>
Scott: Of course computers can and should be used to look at cost
controls, but the bill allows for the data to be used with personal
indentifiers. The law enforcement provisions are incredible, and the
numbers of persons who receive access to records with indentifiers is
enormous. So, while the technology could be used to address management
problems, the law doesn't do so in a way that comes close to protecting
patient privacy. The main privacy protection are large penalties on
individuals who break the rules. Unfortunately, quite a bit of access is
provided, particularly for government investigators and researchers.
Actually, quite a bit is really an understatment.
jamie
----------------------------------------------------------------------
James Love, love@tap.org
P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036; v. 202/387-8030; f. 202/234-5176
Consumer Project on Technology; http://www.essential.org/cpt/cpt.html
Taxpayer Assets Project; http://www.essential.org/tap/tap.html