[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BNA reports new DOJ-Court effort on court opinions
According to a May 1, 1995 BNA report titled "Alternative Case Citation
Issue Examined by Joint DOJ-Judicial Group," the Department of Justice
and the U.S. Judicial Conference Civil Issues Working Group has agreed to
"examine the issues surrounding the creation of an alternative citation
method, according to a DOJ official."
The story is written by Morenike Efuntade, and it quotes a number of
persons, including Paul Friedman at DOJ, and Judge J. Owen Forrester, of
the U.S. District Court (and chair of the technology subcommittee of the
Judicial Conference). The article suggests that the courts might back a
proposal to create a central respository of court opinions at Emory
University. At present Emory University disseminates opinions from the
11th Circuit Court via a World Wide Web server on the Internet.
In one quote Judge Forrester says:
"It would seem that if a non-profit organization chooses
to keep a database online of federal decisions that it
would also have the power to assign citations and even number
paragraphs," Forrester told BNA. "If that happened, I think
that would address the core concerns in the present debate.
more later. jamie
----------------------------------------------------------------------
James Love, TAP; internet: love@tap.org
P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036; v. 202/387-8030; f. 202/234-5176
12 Church Road, Ardmore, PA 19003; v. 610/658-0880; f. 610/649-4066