[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: - no subject (01HUOP5ORWR6002GZO) -
- To: dioxin-l <dioxin-l@Essential.ORG>
- Subject: Re: - no subject (01HUOP5ORWR6002GZO) -
- From: Carol Meeds WPB 407-433-2650 x 113 <MEEDS_C@wpb1.dep.state.fl.us>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 14:11:06 -0500 (EST)
- A1-type: MAIL
- Alternate-recipient: prohibited
- Hop-count: 2
- Importance: normal
- In-reply-to: <A69ZVXPH8D42*/R=WPB1/R=A1/U=MEEDS_C/@MHS.dep.state.fl.us>
- MR-Received: by mta WPB1; Relayed; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 14:13:02 -0500
- MR-Received: by mta EPIC66; Relayed; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 14:13:02 -0500
- Posting-date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 14:13:00 -0500 (EST)
- Priority: normal
- UA-content-id: A77ZVXPKBTNO
- X400-MTS-identifier: [;20314113805991/56060@WPB1]
correction
The previous post about 1,000 ppm of dioxin may have been an
error. It is possible that the 1,000 ppm figure represents a
whole stew of dioxin like compounds. sorry for the confusion. I
am trying to get a written report now and will post.