[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

How to Start to Stop Dioxin Exposure in Your Community




     How to Start to Stop Dioxin Exposure in Your Community 
     
     
     By Stephen Lester, Science Director and Charlotte
     Brody, Organizing Director, Citizens Clearinghouse for
     Hazardous Waste with help from Lois Gibbs, John
     Gayusky, Beverly Paigen, Christian Willauer and Barbara
     Sullivan.  Original drawings by Corinne Mitrakas.
     
     Citizens Clearinghouse for Hazardous Waste
     P.O. Box 6806
     Falls Church, Virginia 22040
     703-237-2249
     e-mail:  CCHW@essential.org
     
     
     On September 13, 1994, the U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency (EPA) released its draft
     "reassessment" of the health effects of dioxin. The
     scientific evidence presented in the 2,400 page report
     reveals that dioxin is much more dangerous and much
     more prevalent than previously reported.  The EPA study
     confirms one common fear of grassroots activists: 
     dioxin is a deadly chemical that destroys the health of
     exposed people. The study also reports shocking and
     significant new information: the American people are
     full of dioxin; the average boy, girl, woman or man in
     the United States has enough or almost enough dioxin in
     their body tissues to damage their health. 
     
     CCHW is launching the Stop Dioxin Exposure Campaign in
     response to the EPA's findings. We need you to join us
     in this venture. That's why we've put together this
     start up kit.  These 14 pages are meant to provide you
     with enough information to begin to build a stop dioxin
     exposure coalition in your community. Besides providing
     information, this kit is meant to persuade you that
     dioxin is an issue worth working on. CCHW believes that
     a well planned and well executed nationally linked but
     grassroots based Stop Dioxin Exposure Campaign can shut
     down the sources of dioxin exposure. If we do it right,
     the Stop Dioxin Exposure Campaign will also strengthen
     community groups, bring new people into our movement,
     and begin to rebuild this country into the
     participatory democracy it is supposed to be.  
     
     Let us know what you think about this kit and about the
     possibilities for a Stop Dioxin Exposure Coalition in
     your community. We want to hear your thoughts, your
     ideas and your concerns. You can reach us by mail (P.O.
     Box 6806, Falls Church, Virginia 22040) by phone
     (703)237-2249 or through the CCHW dioxin bulletin board
     by sending the e-mail message:  
     subscribe dioxin-l <your name> 
     to listproc@essential.org  
     
     For Environmental Justice,
     
     
     Lois Marie Gibbs
     Executive Director, CCHW
     
     
     
     Dioxin -- What's the Problem?
     
     The EPA's  draft "reassessment" of the health effects
     of dioxin estimates that the lifetime risk of getting
     cancer from dioxin exposure is between one in 1,000 and
     one in 10,000. Dioxin is also linked to severe
     reproductive and developmental effects. Dioxin exposure
     can damage the immune system, leading to increased
     susceptibility to infectious diseases, and can disrupt
     the function of regulatory hormones. Infertility, birth
     defects, impaired child development, diabetes, and
     thyroid changes are linked to dioxin exposure. 
     
     At the levels present in the bodies of most Americans,
     dioxin harms the immune system, decreases testis size,
     and alters glucose tolerance. At levels present in 1%
     of Americans, (2,500,000 people) dioxin causes
     endometriosis, decreases sperm count, and reduces
     testosterone levels. Dioxin affects the level of male
     and female hormones. Two recent scientific reports show
     that sperm counts are decreasing and the rates of
     hormonally linked cancers such as breast, testes and
     prostate are increasing.
     
     
     What is dioxin?
     
     Dioxin is not the desired result of any one process,
     but an unwanted by-product of many chemical,
     manufacturing, and combustion processes.  Any use of
     chlorine in industrial processes, including
     incineration, results in dioxin formation.  
     
     Dioxin is the group name for many persistent, very
     toxic chemicals. The most toxic form of dioxin is
     2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin or TCDD.  The
     toxicity of all dioxin and dioxin-like substances are
     measured against TCDD. There are 75 chlorinated
     dibenzo-dioxins.  Seven have TCDD-like toxicity.  There
     are 135 chlorinated dibenzo furans.  Ten have 
     TCDD-like toxicity.  There are 209 chlorinated
     biphenyls (PCBs).  Thirteen have TCDD-like toxicity. 
     There are also brominated 
     dibenzo dioxins, dibenzo furans and biphenyls that have
     TCDD-like toxicity.    
     
     
     Where does dioxin come from?
     
     According to EPA, only 50% of dioxin sources are known. 
     Of these, 95% comes from combustion processes.  Garbage
     and medical waste incinerators are the largest
     identified sources.   
               
     Incinerators -- 95% of 50%   (chart)
                                 
     Dioxin is generated by the chlorine content in the
     waste stream burned in medical and garbage
     incinerators.  Chlorine is present in various plastics,
     mostly PVCs.  When these plastics are burned, chlorine
     is released, and quickly reacts with available phenol
     compounds to form dioxin.  The phenol compounds are
     present in wood and paper products.  Dioxins are
     released to the air, end up in the bottom ash, and in
     the fly ash captured by pollution control equipment. 
     
     When chemicals such as PCBs, chlorinated benzenes and
     chlorinated phenols are burned in hazardous waste
     incinerators, chlorine combines with available phenol
     compounds to form dioxin.  
     
     The Missing 50%
     
     Although EPA identified chemical manufacturing/
     processing and industrial/municipal processes as major
     sources of dioxin emissions, they had no data to
     measure how much dioxin is released from these sources.
     EPA acknowledged that the "agency lacks sufficient
     information about emissions from known sources"
     (emphasis added) and has asked industry to "call-in"
     with information on their dioxin emissions.  Forest
     fires and vehicle exhaust are on the list, but known
     dioxin sources such as Dow Chemical in Midland,
     Michigan, Vertac in Jacksonville, Arkansas, and
     Monsanto in St. Louis, Missouri are omitted.  
     
     The Missing Chemical Industry
     
     A major but unmeasured source of dioxin is the chemical
     industry -- in processes that use chlorine in the
     production of pesticides, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics,
     detergents, solvents, and dyes. Herbicides such as
     agent orange and 2,4-D are made by adding chlorine to
     phenoxy compounds.  Dioxin is formed as a by-product
     and ends up in the formulated end-product, such as the
     herbicide Agent Orange or pure PVC polymer, as well as
     in the process waste streams.
     
     The Unmeasured Pulp and Paper Industry 
     
     Another major source of dioxin emissions are pulp and
     paper mills. Dioxin is formed in the pulp and paper
     industry when chlorine or chlorine dioxide is used to
     bleach pulp and paper.  Naturally occurring phenol
     compounds found in wood pulp react with chlorine to
     form dioxin.  This results in dioxin in paper products,
     paper mill sludge, and in the wastes from these plants. 
     
     
     How Are People Exposed to Dioxin?
     
     
     Dioxin, like DDT, does not break down easily in the
     environment. Instead, it bioaccumulates.  This means
     that the body accumulates any dioxin to which you are
     exposed.  Over time, continual low 
     level exposures will "build up" until subtle adverse
     health effects begin to occur. 
     
     Until the EPA report, most people thought they would be
     exposed to dioxin only if they lived near an
     incinerator, a contaminated site, a pulp and paper mill
     or other direct source.  Now we know this is not true.  
     
     According to EPA, 90% of human exposure occurs through
     diet, with foods from animals being the predominant
     pathway.  Animals are exposed primarily from dioxin
     emissions that settle onto soil, water and plant
     surfaces.  Soil deposits enter the food chain by 
     ingestion by grazing animals.  People then ingest
     dioxin through the meat, dairy products, fish and eggs
     they consume.  A recent study by Dr. Arnold Schecter of
     the State University of New York at Binghampton found
     dioxin in many food products purchased in an upstate
     New York supermarket.  Schecter estimated that the 
     average daily intake of dioxin is "at least 50 times
     greater than what EPA estimates is a virtually safe
     dose of dioxin."
     
     Who is likely to have the highest dioxin levels in
     their bodies?   People that eat more than two inland
     fish meals a month. People who live near a dioxin
     source or eat food produced near a dioxin source.
     Children. Breast fed babies.  Anyone who eats a lot of 
     meat, dairy products, or fish.  Dioxin is so pervasive
     that limiting further exposure of the American people
     cannot be accomplished through lifestyle or dietary
     changes. The only sensible way to limit further
     exposure is to shut down the sources of dioxin
     contamination. 
     
     
     How does dioxin damage us?
     
     The EPA report is full of new information on dioxin
     including information on how dioxin and dioxin-like
     chemicals (PCBs, furans) damage the body.  Scientists
     have identified a series of steps that are necessary
     for most if not all of the observed effects of dioxin
     and related compounds.  Once dioxin is in the body, the
     molecules of dioxin (the more dioxin you are exposed to
     the more dioxin molecules present in the body) "attach"
     to specific receptor "sites" in cell tissue much like a
     ship pulling into a loading dock at a pier.  This site
     is normally used by hormones and enzymes to regulate
     certain activities in the body.  When dioxins and
     dioxin-like chemicals occupy this site instead of
     hormones and enzymes, select normal cell functions
     cannot be carried out.  Hormone activity,
     developmental/reproductive and immune functions are
     especially vulnerable to disruption of receptor site
     activity.
     
     We're Almost Full
     
     One of the most striking findings of the report is the 
     significance of what past dioxin exposures may mean for
     public health.  The report identifies levels of dioxin
     in the human body referred to as the "body burden." 
     According to EPA, some adverse effects of dioxins occur
     at levels slightly above average body burden levels
     currently found in the population and that "as body
     burdens increase within and above this range, the
     probability and severity as well as the spectrum of
     human non-cancer effects most likely will increase."
     
     This means that, as a society, we have been
     accumulating dioxin and dioxin-like chemicals in our
     body.  We are very close to "full" when it comes to the
     amount of dioxin that is known or expected to cause
     adverse health effects.  It will only take a small
     additional exposure to "push" us over the edge and
     trigger adverse health effects.  For most people, any
     exposure to dioxin, no matter how small, may lead to
     some adverse health effects.  In other words, no amount
     of additional exposure to dioxin is safe.  
     
     
     How Do We Stop Dioxin Exposure?
     
     No amount of additional exposure is safe. So what do we
     do to stop dioxin exposure? Unlike some other societal
     problems, we know what it would take to stop emitting
     dioxin.
     
     
     At the 2nd Citizens' Conference on Dioxin held in St.
     Louis, MO in July, 1994 activists created two demands:
     
     1)  An immediate halt to the incineration of municipal, 
     hazardous, medical, military and radioactive waste, and
     any such wastes incinerated in cement and or aggregate
     kilns, or other devices; and 
     
     2)  An immediate commencement of a phase-out of the
     industrial production and use of chlorinated organic
     compounds (including plastic, PVC).
     
     
     Greenpeace has called for a national strategy for zero
     dioxin that would include these actions:
     
     EPA should place a moratorium on new dioxin permits.
     EPA should sunset existing dioxin permits.
     EPA should place a moratorium on all new incinerators
     and phase out the burning of chlorinated wastes at
     existing incinerators.
     The use of chlorine and chlorine based bleaches in the
     paper industry should be eliminated.
     A timetable for the rapid phase out of PVC should be
     established.
     
     
     So we know what must be done. We have to get industry
     to place public health before private gain. And if
     industry won't do that voluntarily we have to get
     government to create laws and regulations to protect
     the environment and the health of the American people. 
     
     Simple, right? And we have to accomplish these tasks at
     a time when the prevailing political winds are calling
     for fewer regulations, less taxes and fewer
     restrictions on corporate power.
     
     We can't effectively stop dioxin exposure without
     taking on some basic issues:
     
     Our political system is broken. The vision of a
     democracy in which the people use their power to elect
     representatives to protect and advance their interest
     has turned into a nightmare. In this nightmare power
     comes from money and the ones with the most money have
     the most power.
     
     Our movement is not as strong, as inclusive or as
     united as it needs to be. The Big 10 Environmental
     groups, with their ties to the President and Congress,
     have tended to see grassroots people as potential
     donors or postcard signers, not as essential players in
     the creation of national strategies.  Grassroots
     activists, overwhelmed by their local battles, have not
     often had the time to step back and plan proactive,
     long-term strategies.
     
     Organizing a group to win change is hard, harder than
     it used to be. People are too busy, too distrustful, or
     too unaccustomed to working as a group. The media adds
     to this trend away from community and towards rugged
     individualism by reporting too much bad news and not
     reporting about efforts to make things right. Every day
     we're inundated with tragic stories about things we
     can't do anything about. Rarely does the press cover
     stories about ordinary people organizing together to
     improve their lives.   
     
     We can't expect to win a campaign to stop dioxin
     exposure without overcoming the difficulties of
     organizing, strengthening and uniting our movement and
     beginning to rebuild our democracy.
     
     But we can do it and we must do it. Not by creating a
     flashy 100 national organizations signed-on-but-just-
     on-paper-coalition where local people's involvement is
     limited to writing a check or sending clever postcards
     to their Members of Congress. This has to be hundreds
     of local coalitions figuring out how to work together
     to shut down local sources of dioxin, convince
     corporations to modify their production methods, and to
     create local, state and federal regulations and laws. 
     
     We Can Do It
     
     Dioxin is a powerful national organizing issue. It is a
     serious health threat to all Americans and so it is the
     smokestack in everyone's backyard. Dioxin can provide
     the basis for building local coalitions of Viet Nam
     Veterans, La Leche League breast feeding advocates,
     farmers, indigenous people, incinerator opponents, and
     victims of breast cancer and endometriosis.  Organizing
     around dioxin is a way to initiate a new dialogue with
     the American people on "getting government off our
     backs and then getting government on our side."
     
     The EPA Reassessment of Dioxin gives us the chance to
     broaden and strengthen our groups and deepen our
     involvement in our local communities.  Even if your
     group is deeply involved in local issues, dioxin
     effects everyone, and the EPA reassessment provides
     new, compelling information to share with Sunday school
     classes and PTAs.  Dioxin provides grassroots activists
     with a way to reach new people and break through the
     labels that have been given us by the media and the
     corporations. 
     
     
     Dioxin can also be a powerful electoral issue. In the
     Times Mirror September 1994 poll, The New Political
     Landscape, the voting public is divided into 10
     distinct political groups. Three Republican oriented
     groups make up 36% of registered voters. The four
     Democratic-oriented groups add up to 34%. The largest
     block of swing voters, making up 19% of the electorate,
     are the New Economy Independents. This group is made up
     primarily of high school graduates who are
     underemployed and not optimistic, under 50, 60% female
     and strongly environmentalist. According to this poll,
     candidates of either party need the New Economy
     Independents to win a majority. If stopping dioxin
     exposure can be made into a stated concern of these
     strongly environmentalist voters, no candidate can win
     without jumping onto our bandwagon. 
     
     What's Already Been Done
     
     The Campaign really began when EPA scheduled public
     meetings in six cities in December, 1994 to hear
     comments on the science of the health and exposure
     sections of the document.  With encouraging turnout
     from grassroots activists in most cities, the EPA heard
     more from the grassroots about dioxin than they had
     bargained for.  
     
     EPA was also forced to hold three additional dioxin
     public meetings in Columbus, OH, Atlanta, GA and
     Seattle WA in response to the demands of the
     grassroots.
     
     Over 500 grassroots activists spoke to EPA, the media
     and the public during the meetings and at rallies and
     press events outside the meetings.  In Columbus, OH a
     crowd of over 100 packed the City Council chambers. 
     Thirty two speakers, mostly grassroots toxics activists
     from throughout Ohio and several other Rust Belt
     states, told of dioxin contamination, and the resulting
     health problems, they have suffered at home.  Activists
     also held a rally in front of City Hall, using body
     cut-outs, tombstones, and body bags to dramatize the
     severe health impacts of dioxin exposure.
     
     Comments from grassroots and environmental activists
     dominated the agenda in Dallas. Over 30 people spoke,
     representing groups from across Texas and four
     neighboring states, who are fighting toxic waste-
     burning cement kilns, medical waste incinerators, 
     chemical waste plants, and Agent Orange-related dioxin 
     contamination.  
     
     Speaking for the 800,000 member Texas PTA, Kim Phillips
     told the EPA panel, "It is not acceptable to poison or
     expose any child to a hazard that can be avoided.  The
     illness and death of a child is extremely significant
     to parents, family, and community."
     
     In New York, Newark, Washington, Chicago, San
     Francisco, Seattle and Atlanta, activists echoed the
     concerns raised in Columbus and Dallas. CCHW helped in
     the organizing of regional efforts to give testimony
     and focus the media's attention at the public meetings 
     on the dioxin report. As part of this effort, CCHW
     mailed an alert about the dioxin report and the public
     meetings to 25,000 individual activists and groups.
     CCHW's staff have written and distributed a series of
     short articles on the EPA's report.
     
     EPA's Plans
     
     The next step for the EPA is to review the comments
     submitted during the period around the public meetings.
     A summary of these comments will be prepared and
     evaluated by EPA's Science Advisory Board. That will be
     the final scientific review of the reassessment. EPA
     watchers expect a final report on the health effects of
     dioxin should be released in the fall of 1995. 
     
     The EPA's report should lead to new federal regulations
     based on the reassessment. How long that policy making
     process will take depends, in part, on Congress. If the
     Contract on America advocates are successful in
     prohibiting all new regulations or adding elaborate
     cost-benefit analysis to the regulatory process, any
     new federal restrictions on dioxin may take two years
     or longer. 
     
     EPA is considering holding "dioxin policy workshops"
     later this year. Whether these occur, or whether EPA or
     Congress acts to drastically reduce dioxin exposure, is
     in the hands of grassroots environmental justice groups
     across the country. 
     
     
     What is Our Plan?
     
     The next two years provide a unique opportunity to
     bring together conservationists, environmental justice
     activists, breast cancer victims and breast feeding
     advocates to influence local, state and national policy
     on dioxin emissions and to change the way our nation
     makes, uses and disposes of paper products, plastics
     and chemicals. 
     
     The necessary platform to stop dioxin exposure has
     already been written and rewritten by a variety of
     national groups and coalitions. To turn any or all of
     these demands into reality, CCHW believes that a
     national network of local grassroots organizations must
     create local bottom up, coalition-driven campaigns. 
     
     
     A Dioxin Roundtable to Design a National Grassroots
     Campaign 
     
     CCHW will convene a Dioxin Roundtable of Citizen
     Activists from around the country on the last weekend
     of April in Arlington, Virginia. The goal of this
     Roundtable is to design the components of a national
     grassroots campaign to stop dioxin exposure. In 
     1986 a CCHW Solid Waste Roundtable came up with the
     McToxics Campaign, a successful four year effort to
     limit the use of styrofoam in the fast foods industry. 
     
     The Stop Dioxin Exposure Campaign will be focused on
     creating a public policy debate on dioxin in every
     American household that results in a clear demand for
     protection from further dioxin exposure in time for the
     1996 electoral cycle.  CCHW envisions a coordinated
     effort of grassroots organizations across the country
     all working to educate their communities and to build
     local coalitions of environmental and non-environmental
     groups to publicize the links between the paper and
     chemical industries, solid waste disposal practices,
     health problems and dioxin exposure. This network of
     activists can both focus on reducing local sources of
     dioxin and influencing the EPA and Congress to create a
     national dioxin policy that will encourage recycling,
     stop incineration and change industrial practices to
     protect the American people and their environment from
     further exposure to dioxin. 
     
     
     A Campaign Handbook
     
     CCHW will turn the results of the Roundtable into a
     Stop Dioxin Exposure Campaign Handbook and work with
     groups around the country to turn the guide into
     action. This Campaign Handbook will be distributed with
     a people's guide to the science in the EPA's 2,400 page
     reassessment. But you don't have to wait for the guide
     to be published to get started.
     
     
     Getting Started: The First Nine Steps in Building a
     Local Stop Dioxin Exposure Coalition
     
     1. If you're part of a local group you can skip the
     first step. If there is no group, or if your once
     active group has fallen apart, dioxin can be the reason
     to come together. First, get one or two people to read
     this kit. Then sit down with them and make up a list of
     other people who should be involved. Get a copy to each
     of them, ask them to read it and be ready to talk 
     about it when they come to a get-together on a certain
     date.  You've got the beginnings of a group.  
     
     2. Once you have a group, take the time to have a good
     discussion about dioxin. You could divide up the
     meeting into the same headings that are in this guide
     and have a different person take the lead on each
     heading. Your group really needs to take the time to
     discuss this issue in order to decide whether or not to
     take a leading role in building a coalition to stop
     dioxin exposure. This is a big commitment and needs the
     active endorsement of your whole group.
     
     3. Have your group brainstorm all of the possible local 
     organizations that have a stake in stopping dioxin
     exposure.  The Yellow Pages or any other source book
     with lists of local organizations can help. If your
     group doesn't have enough diversity to make the best
     list, get other people to help with this process.
     
     4. Everyone in your group thinks of everyone they know
     in any of these groups. An uncle? A member of their
     church? 
     
     5. Prioritize your list of possible coalition members.
     What groups will have to take a small step to join the
     coalition? What groups will have to make a major leap?
     Put the groups in order with the small step groups
     first.
     
     6. Figure out which people in your group are best to
     visit the top ten possible coalition members. Get a
     clear commitment from your group members on who they're
     willing to visit. Role play what you'll say in these
     visits. You are going to be asking these groups to come
     to a meeting to discuss forming a local coalition to
     stop dioxin exposure. You are not asking the group to
     join. That will come later. Pick a date by which all
     first round visits will be done. It may help to plan a
     meeting date at which this first round of prospective
     coalition members can get together. Put together a time
     line that allows you time to visit each group at least
     a few weeks before the initial coalition meeting date.
     
     7. Hold the meeting. Have a proposed statement of
     principles for the coalition. Come with proposals that
     set up clear expectations of what will be expected of
     each coalition participant.  How will decisions be
     made? Who can speak for the coalition? How will the 
     coalition be funded? The best meetings are those with a
     clear set of questions to be answered and an
     established process that lets everyone at the meeting
     have a say in answering those questions.  The sample
     coalition statement at the back of this guide will 
     help you get started. At the end of the meeting you
     should have an agreed upon set of operating principles
     that each representative can take back to their group. 
     
     8. Find out where the sources of dioxin are in your
     community. This can be the first activity of your
     forming coalition. Look for incinerators, not only
     large solid waste burners, but also smaller
     incinerators found at hospitals, universities and
     laboratories. Many communities also have cement kilns
     and sewage sludge incinerators. In addition, there are
     unique sources of dioxin such as pulp and paper plants,
     metal refining operations (smelters) and industrial
     plants that manufacture plastics, dyes and pesticides
     made with chlorine. 
     
     9. Call CCHW for more information. We'll answer your
     questions, send you the Stop Dioxin Exposure Campaign
     Handbook and People's Guide to the EPA's Dioxin
     Reassessment, put you in touch with other forming
     coalitions, and help out in any way we can. 
     
     10. Get ready to change the country. Shutting down the
     sources of dioxin won't be easy. Industry will say that
     there just haven't been enough studies or that the
     existing studies are bad science. Coalition members
     will be in conflict over strategies or funding. The
     Contract with America advocates will explain that
     regulation isn't necessary. But look at what we stand
     to win with a successful national bottom-up campaign. 
     We get less cancer, stronger immune systems, fewer
     birth defects, and more people who can bear healthy
     children when they're ready to start a family. We also
     get the beginnings of a rebuilt democracy based on the
     coalition efforts of local people who have figured out
     how to limit corporate influence and maximize public
     participation.  
     
     
     Sample Statement of Principles
     
     The Happy Valley Stop Dioxin Exposure Coalition is a
     coalition of individuals and groups in Jefferson,
     Lincoln and Roosevelt Counties committed to working
     together to stop dioxin exposure locally, statewide and
     nationally. To accomplish our purpose, the Happy Valley
     Stop Dioxin Exposure educates our community about
     dioxin and advocates for policies that will reduce this
     serious health and environmental problem.
     
     All organizations that belong to the Stop Dioxin
     Exposure Coalition agree to educate their membership on
     dioxin, take an active role in educating the community.
     pay $50 in annual dues and participate in fundraising
     and strategic activities endorsed by the coalition. At
     least one member of each coalition organization is
     expected to represent her/his organization at regularly
     scheduled monthly meetings. Every organizational member
     of the coalition has one vote. 
     
     An organization is considered a member when the
     coalition is presented with a letter, signed by
     officers of the organization, indicating that the
     organization voted to join the coalition and pays their
     dues.
     
     Individuals are encouraged to join the coalition and
     participate in all events and activities. Individual
     dues are $20 per family per year. Individuals who do
     not represent an organization may be elected to an
     office in the coalition. A voting delegate will be
     elected to represent every 50 individual members.
     
     No activity will be undertaken by the coalition unless
     sixty percent (60%) of the voting delegates present at
     any regularly called meeting vote to endorse the
     activity.
     
     The Stop Dioxin Exposure Campaign may elect officers
     and committee chairs at any regularly scheduled
     meeting.  A vote by the majority of voting delegates
     present is necessary for election.  Spokespeople for
     the coalition may be approved in the same manner.
     Nominations may be taken from the floor for all
     offices.
     
     
     What's A Campaign Without Buttons and T-Shirts?
     
     Three inch round white buttons with black and red
     campaign logo are available from CCHW for $1.00 each.
     For orders of 10 to 49, the price is $.75 a piece. For
     orders of 50 or more the price of a button is $.50.
     
     All cotton t-shirts are also available. These are high
     quality V-neck shirts with the logo on the front and
     Stop Dioxin Exposure across the back.  Each t-shirt is
     $12.00.
       
     Additional copies of this start-up guide are available.
     If you are a group considering building a coalition,
     CCHW will send you as many as you need for the cost of
     shipping and handling. Others may receive a copy for
     $5.00 postage paid.
     
     Let us know what you're doing to stop dioxin exposure.
     CCHW is prepared to link together the efforts of local
     coalitions. But first we have to know that you want to
     be a part of the effort.  Send us your name and address
     and we will put you on out Stop Dioxin Exposure mailing
     list.  If you have questions about dioxin or coalition
     building or ideas on strategies to stop dioxin
     exposure, please contact us at:
     
     CCHW, P.O. Box 6806, Falls Church, VA  22040  (703)
     237-CCHW (2249).  Subscribe to the dioxin bulletin
     board by sending the e-mail message 
     
     Subscribe dioxin-l <your name> 
     
     to listproc@essential.org or contact CCHW by e-mail at
     CCHW@essential.org.  Replace "<your name>" with the
     name you want to use in the list.  Be sure to include a
     space after the "L" in dioxin-l.
     

Citizens Clearinghouse for Hazardous Waste
e-mail:  CCHW@essential.org